Comparative Stratigraphy
Prepared by Vern Crisler
Copyright, 2003
Rough Draft
|
Site/
BC Date |
Iron 2a Omri to Uzziah’s Earthquake 879-783 |
Iron 2b Post-Earth- quake to Fall of Jerusalem 783-586 |
Iron 2c Neo-Baby- lonian to Cyrus 586-537 |
Persian
537- |
|
Abu-Hawam, Tell |
3 |
- |
- |
|
|
Aphek |
X-8 |
X-7 X-6 |
- |
|
|
Arad (?) |
12 |
11 10 9 8 |
7-6 |
|
|
Aroer, ‘ |
- |
- |
2 1 |
|
|
Ashdod |
10 9 |
8 |
7 6 |
|
|
Beer-sheba, Tell (?) |
7,6 5 |
4 3 |
2 - |
|
|
Beit-Mirsim, Tell |
B-3 |
A-2 |
A-1 |
|
|
Beth-Shan |
Upper 5 |
4 |
|
|
|
Beth-Shemesh |
2a |
2b |
2c |
|
|
Dan |
4 |
3 2 |
|
|
|
Ekron (Miqne?) |
4 |
(3) (2) |
1c 1b |
1a |
|
Ful, Tell el- |
2- ? |
- |
3 |
|
|
Gedi, En (Goren) |
- |
- |
5 |
|
|
Gezer |
9 8 |
7 6 |
5 |
|
|
Halif, Tell |
7 |
7b |
7a |
|
|
Hazor |
10 9 |
8 7 6 5b 5a |
|
|
|
Hesi, Tell el- |
|
7d-7c |
7d(?) |
6 |
|
Ira, Tell |
- |
- |
city |
|
|
Jemmeh, Tell |
“EF” |
“CD” |
“AB” |
|
|
Jerusalem |
14 |
13 12 |
11 10 |
10a |
|
Kadesh-barnea |
early fort |
middle fort |
late fort |
|
|
Keisan, Tell |
8c-a |
7 6 |
5 4b 4a |
3b |
|
Kheleifeh, Tell el- |
period 1? |
2 |
3 4 |
|
|
Kinrot, Tell |
4 |
3 2 |
1 |
|
|
Lachish |
5 |
4 3 |
2 |
|
|
Megiddo |
5b 5a-4b |
4a |
3 2 |
|
|
Mevorakh, Tell |
8 7 |
- |
- |
|
|
Qasile, Tell |
9 8 |
- |
“7” |
|
|
Qiri, Tell |
7a |
7b-c |
6 5 |
|
|
Ramat-Rahel |
- |
5b |
5a |
|
|
Sa’idiyeh, Tell es- |
12(?) 11 |
10- 6 |
|
|
|
Samaria |
1 2 |
3 4 5/6 |
7 |
|
|
Sera’, Tell |
7 |
- |
6 |
|
|
Shechem |
10 9b |
9a 8 7 |
6 |
5 |
|
Taanach |
2a 2b |
3 4 |
5 |
|
|
Timnah, (Batash) |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
Tirzah (Farah, N) |
7b |
7c 7d 7e |
7e-1 |
|
|
Yoqneam |
16 15 14 |
13 12 |
11 |
|
The above table is based in part on the table presented in Amihai Mazar’s Archaeology of the Land of the Bible, pp. 372-73. One primary difference is that I follow Wright in placing Shechem 9b as contemporary with Hazor 9 (cf., G. E. Wright, Shechem: The Biography of a Biblical City, p. 153). Another primary difference is that I accept the Low Chronology for the Iron age as advocated by some historians and archaeologists (e.g., Wightman, Finkelstein, Ussishkin, et al.). Also, my general chronological framework is summarized as the New Courville Interpretation, a revision of the chronology first set forth by Donovan Courville in his pioneering work, The Exodus Problem and Its Ramifications, 1971.
The New Courville Interpretation places the earthquake of Uzziah’s day at the end of Shechem 9b, Samaria 2, Hazor 9, and Megiddo 5a-4b, etc. We also hold that Lachish 3 was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar 2, contary to Ussishkin’s views.
This chart will be updated from time to time as new information is gathered about these site locations. It is not assumed here that every last one of these sites represents the correct biblical city (Tell Beersheba for instance).