Archive for August, 2009

Real Health Care Reform

Posted: August 26, 2009 in Government

Sarah provides an easy to understand discussion of why tort reform is absolutely necessary before any health care reform can work.


Beyond Obama

Posted: August 24, 2009 in Politics

Charles Kesler has a thoughtful discussion of the future of American conservatism:

At one point he says: “American conservatism stands or falls, however, by its allegiance to the American Revolution and Founding, even as modern liberalism really began, in the Progressive era, with a condemnation and rejection of America’s revolutionary and constitutional principles.”

I believe many Americans are now beginning to understand this.


The Death of Big Porn

Posted: August 24, 2009 in Culture


Very instructive was the following comment: “Porn star Savannah Stern earned $150,000 two years ago, at the height of the boom, working four or five days a week. But Stern is now lucky to work one day a week, and has traded in her Mercedes-Benz CLK 350 for a Chevy Trailblazer given to her by her parents. While Stern hopes to earn some money dancing on the exotic-club circuit, she’s planning to go to college for an interior-design degree, the L.A. Times reports.”

I think the lure of porn or exotic dancing for many young women is the old idea of trying to get something for nothing.  The jobs of having (faked) sex on screen, or “dancing” for money, used to turn in big profits – and did so without requiring a great deal of talent, skill, or work.  All a girl needed was looks.  Now that has changed, and as Ms. Stern has learned, there’s nothing better than the old-fashioned thing we call education.


Shoshenq I

Posted: August 23, 2009 in Archaeology

The “Centuries of Darkness” group has an interesting comment in their “Recent Developments” section:

“March 2009. A fascinating article has been published by Dr Rupert Chapman (British Museum), entitled “Putting Shoshenq I in His Place” in the Palestine Exploration Quarterly 141:1 (2009), pp. 4-17. Chapman presents a fresh analysis of a question that has intrigued archaeologists since 1926, when a fragment of a victory-stlea of Shoshenq I (founder of the Egyptian 22nd Dynasty) was found at the site of ancient Megiddo in Israel – it was found in the ‘dump’ from earlier excavations, but which stratum did it originally belong to? While reattributing such a find a century after it was discovered is fraught with difficulty, Chapman deduces that it was orginally set up in Stratum V, which by cross-dating with his work on the pottery of Samaria must have been a 9th-century BC level. He concludes: “On the basis of the purely stratigraphic argument set out above, it becomes clear that Sheshonq I and his expedition should also be dated to the 9th century BC.” Chapman’s paper is the first study (outside Centuries of Darkness) to argue from archaeological grounds that the conventional dating of Shoshenq I to the late 10th century BC is incorrect (see FAQ # 6 and #7).”

In terms of the New Courville perspective, the range of Megiddo level 5 is from 879 B.C. to 783 B.C. (i.e., 9th century to beginning of 8th century).  The stratum is Iron Age 2a.  In terms of our reconstruction, IA2a would be from Omri to Uzziah’s Earthquake, which covers the 9th century at the least.  (See our Iron Age 2 chart.)

Thus Chapman’s theory is consistent with New Courville’s placement in the archaeological record of Shoshenq 1 in relation to the biblical data.


Clunker Economics

Posted: August 12, 2009 in Economics

Whether we’re maxing out our credit cards for bailouts, “stimulus,” or for Obamacare, it still has to be paid for.  For a critique of spending-our-way-to-prosperity economics, see:

Favorite quote: “When you stop doing economics and instead wander into mass psychology, anything goes.  In fact, throwing virgins into a volcano might boost GDP, depending on what the public believes.” — Robert P. Murphy

See also Doug French’s discussion of the harmful effects of inflationist policies:


The Return of Carterism

Posted: August 4, 2009 in Economics

Many people are beginning to understand what’s wrong with welfare-state liberalism.  It costs money.  They look at the huge federal deficit, and the near-bankruptcy of California, and realize that we can’t just spend our way into prosperity.

Think of a guy who buys lots of stuff and looks to all the world like he’s prosperous.  Only he got that way by maxing out his credit card.  Is he really prosperous?  Most of us would say no, for no matter how little we may understand about economic theory, we do realize that when we max out a credit card, we have to pay it back someday.

When government spends money on bailouts and “stimulus” packages, it’s doing essentially the same thing — maxing out its credit card.  The day of reckoning has to come at some point.  We normally pay off our own cards by painful savings, or in worse cases, make use of credit counseling, or go bankrupt.

Government has two ways of paying off its credit card:  taxes or inflation.  Raising taxes is politically difficult, and a pretty stupid thing to do during a recession.  Taxes depress economic activity which is not the result you want during a recession.  Inflation has been the preferred way government pays off its debts — supported by an economic theory known as Keynesianism.

By inflation, government creates money out of thin air.  Things are economically valuable when they’re rare, and when they aren’t, they lose economic value.  Air is one of our most valuable resources, but it has no economic value.  Why?  Because it is too abundant.  (Pressurized oxygen is another matter.)  Nobody would pay anything for air in its native state.  Have you ever tried to sell air for a nickel?

Money is like that too.  If it’s rare it’s more valuable and if it’s not rare, it’s less valuable.  When government creates money out of thin air and pumps too much of it into the economy, each individual unit of money is less rare and therefore less valuable.  In practical terms, it means higher prices. 

Government has all too often been willing to use inflation as a way of paying off its maxed out credit card, but it’s as harmful to the economy as private counterfeiting is, or as harmful as enemy counterfeiting is during wartime. 

The problem with Keynesianism, or new Keynesianism, is that it believes in effect that you can create prosperity by maxing out your credit cards.  Think of all the wonderful things you can buy now!  Don’t worry about tomorrow.  In the long run, say the Keynesian inflationists, we’re all dead anyway.

If you say, how can I be prosperous if I’m up to my eyeballs in debt, inflationists will answer that “inflation is your friend.”  Since the money is worth less after inflation, your real debt is actually less than your nominal debt, the debt recorded in your books.

Isn’t that a way of robbing from lenders since they will be paid back in less valuable money?  Not to worry, we’ll just lend the lenders some more money.  And yes, it will seem like there’s prosperity all around because of all the lending and money that’s available.  But something deep down tells you it’s an illusion.

It’s an illusion because the money is actually worth less than it was before.  It’s only a nominal prosperity, so to speak, not a real one.  And nominal prosperity is what politicians love, since they can parcel the new money out to their favorite voting blocks.

These voting blocks are happiest because they get access to the new money before it loses its value, while later on old people or people on fixed incomes suffer the loss of their purchasing power.

Then when stagflation finally arrives, you are lectured by inflationists about a crisis of confidence, about losing faith, about worshipping self-indulgence and consumption, and about the need for windfall profits taxes and import restrictions, etc.

You see, it’s not government’s fault that we’re in this mess.  It’s our fault really, for we are the ones who have caused all this malaise.  At least that is what inflationists will tell you.

Recently, we’ve heard talk of a second stimulus bill.  But what would you think of a man if he decided to buy even more cool stuff by maxing out another credit card.  That’s essentially what we have with the idea of a second stimulus bill.

Perhaps the American people will someday realize that they need to think before they vote.